APR-MAY 05 / VOL. 5 ISSUE 7
The following transcripts are courtesy of the Northern Ireland Information Service.

Paisley, Trimble Discuss State of Parties
 

Program: ITN
Date & Time: March 23, 2005 – 10.50am
Subject: Peace Process

IAN PAISLEY

(Unclear) and if you have chosen to take another road of terrorism, you’re out, and that’s it, and we should get on with it.

ALISTAIR STEWART

Have you discussed that with the SDLP, because that’s exactly what they’ve said over the last 24 hours?

IAN PAISLEY

Well I have discussed it with the SDLP, but the SDLP are biting their lips on this election business, and they have difficulties.

ALISTAIR STEWART

How do you mean?

IAN PAISLEY

Well they wonder just how many seats they’re going to hold, and they also wonder how big the vote for the IRA/Sinn Fein will be.

ALISTAIR STEWART

That’s a crucial factor, isn’t it, because both in the Republic and in Northern Ireland, the simple truth of the matter is, whatever you say about Sinn Fein or the SDLP say about them, or indeed anybody does, they still pull in the votes at the ballot boxes, and that’s the big gamble for the SDLP itself and for you seeking to do business with the SDLP?

IAN PAISLEY

Well of course the SDLP if they were (unclear), it might be easier to do business with, it cuts both ways. I mean if they get a hiding from IRA/Sinn Fein they’ll be more able to do business with unionists. 

ALISTAIR STEWART

Shock (unclear).

IAN PAISLEY

I mean they’ll be prepared, it will be shock treatment, but I mean, the battle in Northern Ireland at this election is simply the battle for the union, I mean, and the SDLP have now lined up again as a united Irish party, they’ve brought the Foreign Secretary from the South in to spread their propaganda and so this is going to be a major issue. Are we going to have a union or not have it?

ALISTAIR STEWART

That’s going back eight years, Dr Paisley?

IAN PAISLEY

Yes it is, but that’s, they brought it back, I mean I was amazed at them bringing a Foreign Secretary from another country to start their election campaign off, but so they did in Newry yesterday.

ALISTAIR STEWART

Indeed, is there any way that Sinn Fein, Mr Adams, Mr McGuinness, other people there, can sit down and talk and ask everybody else to pretend that the IRA isn’t there?

IAN PAISLEY

No, well I believe that we have to be absolutely true to our people, I believe people are asking for truth, I believe what happened in the Short Strand is, even the people who are republicans, they want the truth, they’re sick, sore and tired of what has happened, and the time for the truth has come.

********

April 8, 2005

Program: Hearts and Minds – David Trimble
Date & Time April 7, 2005 – 20.00
Subject Politics
 

NOEL THOMPSON

Mr Trimble, the Assembly election left your party wounded and in disarray, has anything happened in the last 18 months to make you think fortunes are going to get better for you?

DAVID TRIMBLE

I disagree with the comment about the party being in disarray, it’s anything but. We’ve changed our constitution, we’ve got the party in very good form at the moment and we’ve got an excellent team of candidates that are standing, a blend of people with experience at Westminster, people who got really good experience when they were in the Assembly and new candidates as well and I think the public are going to be impressed and I’m certainly proud of the team that we have.

NOEL THOMPSON

But you were wounded in 2003, you must have been, well we know you were, you said you were?

DAVID TRIMBLE

Well that was that election, this is this election and we’re going to fight this election positively because people have now seen over the course of the 13 months that other parties have not succeeded. We’ve had no political process in the course of the last year, we’re in a stalemate and the stalemate looks as though it’s going to be there and I think the electorate are going to see that the consequence of voting for the extremes has been damaging to politics and Ulster and we need to see the centre being rebuilt and that is what we hope that the electorate will do in this election.

NOEL THOMPSON

But many commentators would say that your party, far from claiming the centre ground, is trying to out DUP the DUP?

DAVID TRIMBLE

No there is no change in our fundamental approach to this. We’re reasonable people who approach matters constructively. If any party has changed its position in the last two years it’s the DUP. 

NOEL THOMPSON

(unclear) they’ve moved more towards centre ground perhaps?

DAVID TRIMBLE

Well the interesting thing with regard to them is they conducted a negotiation, they said they were satisfied with the outcome yet they haven’t changed a single word of the Belfast Agreement which a few years ago they declared they were going to destroy. Now who has changed their position, not us. We have stayed absolutely clearly on our position.

NOEL THOMPSON

But it was a position the electorate rejected?

DAVID TRIMBLE

No I don’t agree with that because the electorate endorsed our position.

NOEL THOMPSON

You ended up in third place in the Assembly election?

DAVID TRIMBLE

The electorate endorsed our position (unclear) the ’98 election, the 2001 election, yes other parties got ahead of us in 2003, but our basic proposition is that the political institutions in Northern Ireland have to be founded on an absolute commitment to peace and democracy, without which they will not succeed. Now does any party disagree with that, because that’s our fundamental position?

NOEL THOMPSON

Well the DUP would say that you said one thing and did another thing in ’98, you mentioned it, you said there would be no Executive with unreconstructed terrorists, in ’99 you said there would be no guns, no government. But your opponents say, you did it, you went in?

DAVID TRIMBLE

But where are we now, and where is the Government? We stuck to that principle and we said to parties, and we said to republicans that if they do not move down the transition that was envisaged towards exclusively peaceful and democratic means then we….

NOEL THOMPSON

But twice you said that and then went back in with them, that’s the point?

DAVID TRIMBLE

We went in for the purpose of achieving progress and when republicans failed we blew the whistle and the reason why we have suspension is because we insisted on it in 2002 and I will not take, from a party that went into government and stayed there quite happily and made no effort to put any pressure on republicans, I will not take lessons from them on sticking to the commitments that we made, which we did, in order to ensure, and don’t forget we were the party that actually achieved decommissioning, that has to be remembered.

NOEL THOMPSON

Well it’s a decommissioning which the unionist electorate rejected because they didn’t think it was enough and the DUP will say, they were the ones who actually pulled the plug in December because of the decommissioning, in their view?

DAVID TRIMBLE

Let us get the facts, let us stick to the facts. As a result of our efforts decommissioning began and it was repeated and then we decided in October…

NOEL THOMPSON

But not to your satisfaction.

DAVID TRIMBLE

…let me finish Noel, I’m about to deal with the point. We decided in October 2002 that there had not been sufficient progress, that there had to be, there’s a whole point about having a transition, that you’re expecting progress and because there hadn’t been sufficient progress we blew the whistle. As for last December, the truth of the matter is that the DUP were scared that they were going to find themselves in an administration. That’s why they went round the country talking about sack cloth and ashes. They’d suddenly realised that they were only one photograph away from having to form an administration and they panicked.

NOEL THOMPSON

There was no administration formed and now we have Gerry Adams saying, in no uncertain terms, that it’s time for the IRA to fold up its tent and go, the DUP will say, we did that, we showed them in December?

DAVID TRIMBLE

No we have laid the foundation for that and we did that in the efforts that we made in the (unclear) right up until 2002. The whole business since 2002 has been to try and get the acts of completion that were called for. The whole political agenda was set in October 2002 and has remained there. Unfortunately last December the DUP’s negotiation failed. Now we’ll see what comes in the future. I have heard promises from Mr Adams before and we have seen them not fulfilled and the timing of the present manoeuvre is obviously related to the election. So we will wait to see what happens, but I, my own assessment of the matter is that the republican movement isn’t actually prepared to deliver completion. The issue crystallised at that in 2002, and between 2002 and now, there have been three serious attempts to try and get republicans to carry out those acts of completion and on each occasion they failed, and on each occasion it’s for the same reason. I think there is a systemic problem here and our view is that we’re not actually going to get it. What you’re getting are manoeuvres from republicans, we’ve had manoeuvres, we haven’t had completion and I would be very surprised if it comes.
NOEL THOMPSON

But if there’s no difference, as you say, now in principle between yourselves and the DUP on the matter of the Good Friday Agreement, they would take great issue with that, but that’s your claim that there’s no difference in principle. If there is no difference, people have now chosen the DUP in their droves, the DUP is the main unionist party, why would people be tempted to go back to you then? 

DAVID TRIMBLE

Wait a minute. When people voted in November 2003, the position of the DUP was not clear, it’s clearer now, and I think we’ll see where the electorate go with this.

NOEL THOMPSON

Have you any evidence to say that they do not support the DUP in the same or greater numbers …?

DAVID TRIMBLE

(Unclear) then do remember that the DUP actually failed to produce a successful outcome to their negotiation, their negotiation …

NOEL THOMPSON

It’s not how it’s perceived though, it’s perceived that the DUP stuck it to the IRA.

DAVID TRIMBLE

And failed to get an agreement, and the consequent …

NOEL THOMPSON

Their supporters say it’s because the IRA failed, not because the DUP failed.

DAVID TRIMBLE

(Unclear) either way they present it, the reality is that there was not a successful outcome to it, and I don’t think that the DUP are actually going to be able to achieve the sort of progress we need. We need a situation where we’re going to be bringing people together in Northern Ireland, not dividing them. We need a situation where we try to persuade people to move on from conflict to create a society that people can be at ease and work together, and not to have a situation where people are continually harping on the factors that have led to conflict.

NOEL THOMPSON

Yes, but Ian Paisley has said, even post the Northern Bank and the Robert McCartney murder he is prepared to do business with republicans as long as the IRA is gone.

DAVID TRIMBLE

Well ...

NOEL THOMPSON

Which is your position, presumably? So there is nothing to choose between you, except the electorate has chosen them?

DAVID TRIMBLE

Well let’s see who the electorate do choose, and let us see whether the claims that are made are borne out by the events. I think that people see in the experience of a situation where some of the electorate moved towards the parties on the extremes, has actually reinforced the stalemate and we have had no significant progress over the next year, and you’ve got to consider where society and politics will go if we remain stuck in this stalemate, and where we still have parties that are still fundamentally, in their approach to things, thinking in terms of a political conflict rather than a situation where we’re trying to transcend that.

NOEL THOMPSON

Okay, but you have proposed a pact which would take that choice away from people in many areas, and the DUP see that as just trying to save your own skin, because every seat that your party holds is under potential threat?

DAVID TRIMBLE

And every seat is under threat in every election. What we were actually proposing to the DUP ...

NOEL THOMPSON

Well that’s not strictly proven, there has been safe seats which are no longer safe seats, East Antrim for one?

DAVID TRIMBLE

What we were proposing to the DUP was a pact that would be aimed at Sinn Fein to reduce the Sinn Fein representation, it would have succeeded in doing so. The policy put forward by the DUP is one that would allow Sinn Fein to grow and that is not in the interests of politics, and you have to then ask the question, why is it faced with the choice between minimising Sinn Fein, attacking Sinn Fein or at a course of action that enables them to grow, why is it that the DUP prepare the latter, that’s the question?

NOEL THOMPSON

Well because they say that there is no reason not to offer people a choice everywhere, and then if they choose the DUP and Sinn Fein (unclear) we stand?

DAVID TRIMBLE

What we need to do in this situation, what would be desirable in this situation is to maximise the unionist vote in those situations where it would increase unionist representation and that would have happened under the proposals we put to them, and reduce Sinn Fein representation. Now that I would have thought would have been a good …

NOEL THOMPSON

But why not offer unionists the choice in those constituencies where there’s no chance of a nationalist taking a seat, you didn’t even want to face that kind of competition?

DAVID TRIMBLE

We will face that competition, and we will succeed …

NOEL THOMPSON

The pact proposals were not to accept that kind of competition, (unclear) the seats you hold (unclear) not to have a DUP challenge there?

DAVID TRIMBLE

We will see what happens when the time comes, and don’t suggest that we are in anyway worried about this. We think actually the unionist electorate would welcome a situation where there was greater co-operation amongst unionists rather than the fighting that the DUP prefer, that’s what we think the unionist electorate will prefer. But if the DUP don’t want to work together, if their preference, if their priority is to attack other unionists, we will defend ourselves and we will defend ourselves successfully. I have no doubt about that at all, but I know what the unionist electorate would prefer, they would prefer to see co-operation between unionists and they would prefer to see Sinn Fein reduced in size in terms of Parliamentary representation. That we could have done, but for the approach taken by the DUP.

NOEL THOMPSON

What about your own position, you had a lead of 2000 votes at the last Westminster election after a recount, I mean you’re under serious threat yourself, aren’t you?

DAVID TRIMBLE

No, I’m quite confident, I was confident then. The recount was a stunt, the recount was done, in my view, to give people the opportunity to gather up a crowd for the disgraceful scenes we saw outside the count, and that I think is a reflection on where some other parties are. I’m quite confidence of the outcome there, and in our other seats as well.

NOEL THOMPSON

Can you confirm, we understand it, you opened a new office in Banbridge in the last couple of weeks, did you have to close an office in Portadown after just a few weeks?

DAVID TRIMBLE

No, no, no, there’s no truth in that, and actually it was several months ago that we opened up the office in Banbridge, and we had an office in Banbridge beforehand.

NOEL THOMPSON

Yes, so what happened to the Portadown office?

DAVID TRIMBLE

It’s there and it’s functioning.

NOEL THOMPSON

And it’s not closed?

DAVID TRIMBLE

It’s not closed.

NOEL THOMPSON

And you’ve no intentions of closing it?

DAVID TRIMBLE

No, no, no, no. No, I’m afraid some people throw some disinformation around that (unclear).

NOEL THOMPSON

That’s why you’re here to clear it up.

DAVID TRIMBLE

If you bothered to check with me beforehand then you wouldn’t have had to give air time to this untruth.

NOEL THOMPSON

You’re here to clear it up on air, you can’t complain about that. You said at your party’s annual conference, you said tonight that your a party of inclusivity, but you said that sectarianism was not in your DNA, how do you reconcile that with the details in this "It’s Not Fair" document, which many people see as a sectarian document itself, it says it’s not fair to tax people more because they’re unionists, it’s not fair to discriminate against Protestants in schools, it’s not fair to recruit police officers on the basis of religion and it’s not fair that Protestants should be discriminated against in employment?

DAVID TRIMBLE

Is there any suggestion, is there any suggestion that there should be discrimination on the grounds of religious persuasion? We’ve had legislation in Northern Ireland which is designed to outlaw …

NOEL THOMPSON

Yet it is you are deciding that there is, that’s where the argument lies.

DAVID TRIMBLE

Wait a minute, wait a minute. If you look at the leaflet you’ll see that it actually quotes from the department’s own equality impact assessment and what we’re saying there is, quoting from the Departments’ own assessment, that its policy with regard to water charges would be discriminatory in its effect. Now you’re not going to …

NOEL THOMPSON

Because it would tax richer people more.

DAVID TRIMBLE

It goes further that view, you quoted earlier what the equality impact assessment actually said and I think discrimination is wrong and I don’t see why people should be turned round and because they point to acts of discrimination and say this should not happen, that one should not then be criticised for doing so.

NOEL THOMPSON

Ok we understand it has become something of an issue in North Down for example, with the Alliance Party asking Lady Hermon to (unclear).

DAVID TRIMBLE

Maybe you should ask the Alliance Party why they’re generating an issue about this. Are they in favour of discrimination?

NOEL THOMPSON

What about your own position, Mr. Trimble, if you lose one seat out of the 6 you have will you resign? If you lose two seats, will you resign?

DAVID TRIMBLE

I am the servant of my party. I’ve never been anything other than the servant of the party and I’ll continue because the party wishes me to do so.

NOEL THOMPSON

Is there not an issue of personal pride in it, I mean, would you, if you saw yourself as presiding over a party which lost …?

DAVID TRIMBLE

There are always personal considerations in this but my overall consideration is a question of what is my duty and I have, that is what has guided me through the last number of years. In all the difficult situations that we have faced and we have faced some really difficult situations from when we entered negotiations and where we carried through that to make progress for the people here. Now we’ve achieved progress, Northern Ireland’s a much better place than it was a decade ago and if, if I consider it’s my duty to continue, I will and if I consider that it is my duty to do otherwise, I will do otherwise.

*****

Program: Hearts & Minds
Date & Time: April 14, 2005 – 8pm
Subject Election platform

NOEL THOMPSON

Tonight though a no-show, Ian Paisley has declined our invitation to share his thoughts with us this week, he’s the only main party leader to do so. His deputy Peter Robinson is here instead.

Now you’ve brought your manifesto, I’m delighted because we haven’t had a chance to see it, this is the last draft, and I do want to talk about it, it seems Bob McCartney has had quite a hand in it. Let’s deal with a couple of issues, he says you told him a mandatory coalition which includes Sinn Fein under d’Hondt or any other system is out of the question, does that appear in those words in that manifesto?

PETER ROBINSON

First of all, can I say from Dr Paisley’s point of view, Dr Paisley has a speaking engagement in London and is attending that and will there until late tomorrow, so that’s the reason he’s not with us today. We obviously aren’t going to divulge the full details of our election manifesto until Thursday 21st, today week, that’s when the manifesto will be launched. But as you indicated we’ve had a very good relationship with Bob McCartney and we had no difficulty in our conversations with him in providing him with sight of a page of that document on an issue that he had raised. So the precise words, I think are similar to those that you have spoken.

NOEL THOMPSON

But the precise words are important because I mean you don’t mention anything about, for example, a voluntary coalition with Sinn Fein, (unclear) you only talk about mandatory coalitions?

PETER ROBINSON

Well, you will see the full detail, because we believe that the way forward in Northern Ireland is through a voluntary coalition indeed. I have to say that if we can’t get a voluntary coalition off the ground then basically we’ll be back to a position of having to make Direct Rule as accountable and acceptable as possible and integrating Northern Ireland more closely into the rest of the United Kingdom.

NOEL THOMPSON

Yes, but you could have a voluntary coalition with Sinn Fein?

PETER ROBINSON

You could have if Sinn Fein met the conditions but they don’t, nor do we see them ever meeting those conditions. But I think many people in Northern Ireland have given up on Sinn Fein ever reforming itself. Last December the entry conditions were laid out very clearly, Gerry Adams in his party political broadcast last night made it very clear that the Government of the United Kingdom, the Government of the Republic of Ireland and the US Government had sided with the DUP on those issues, they were right to do so, because unlike the past, when the Ulster Unionist Party was prepared to go into Government and take Sinn Fein/IRA on its word, we weren’t, we required it all to be done upfront first, we required an end to (unclear).

NOEL THOMPSON

(Unclear) proposals (unclear), I do want to talk about them, (unclear).

PETER ROBINSON

(Unclear) come back to them.

NOEL THOMPSON

Let’s stick to the manifesto for the moment. Mr McCartney says you told him it would be a generation, that’s 25 years, before Sinn Fein would be decontaminated, as I think he put it, or you put it. That’s a big leap from December when you were talking about a matter of months?

PETER ROBINSON

Let’s be clear, what we were talking about in terms of the generation was how long it would take for the republican movement to divest itself of its criminality and none of us can judge accurately how long that will be, but it is endemic within the republican movement, they are inextricably linked to criminality, and they have taken a choice very clearly over the last number of months, they don’t want to leave it behind.

NOEL THOMPSON

So you’re prepared to wait 25 years?

PETER ROBINSON

We most certainly are not prepared to wait.

NOEL THOMPSON

You may have to?

PETER ROBINSON

Well no we’re not prepared to wait 25 years, the whole basis of our argument and our manifesto is that we need to move on, and if people aren’t prepared to enter the political process on the basis of exclusively peaceful and democratic means then they should be left behind, the train should move on. Those who are democrats should move on with Government.

NOEL THOMPSON

Well the SDLP say they’re not going to enter any kind of voluntary coalition, so what you’re talking about is another 25 years of Direct Rule, what price will the people of Northern Ireland pay for that?

PETER ROBINSON

They will pay a bigger price if they are to take into the heart of Government those who are still involved in terrorist activity and criminal activity, that would be the big price to pay. And it isn’t us that’s holding things back, it’s those who can’t reform themselves and become exclusively democratic and peaceful parties.

NOEL THOMPSON

So if the IRA do what Gerry Adams has said he wants them to do, sometime in the next couple of months, you’re saying you’ll still have to wait a generation before you’ll talk about sharing power with republicans?

PETER ROBINSON

I’m not going to get into the business of whatiffery, what if the IRA reform, what if they do this, or what if they do that. They haven’t, there’s no sign of them doing it, and therefore you’re asking me to contemplate something that I don’t believe is going to happen.

NOEL THOMPSON

Mr Robinson, Gerry Adams does not make statements like that just out of the blue, there’s a lot of speculation that (unclear).

PETER ROBINSON

… well I heard it all before …

NOEL THOMPSON

(Unclear) … there’s a move in the pipeline here?

PETER ROBINSON

Let’s be clear, you and I have been around for a long time in Ulster politics. We have heard all of the statements from Gerry Adams in the past, and we had all the pundits telling us how things would change and how everything from now on was going to be different, but it wasn’t. They’re still there, the IRA still hasn’t gone away, they’re still involved in terrorist and criminal activity as indeed we have seen over the last number of months to our great cost.

NOEL THOMPSON

Because you see Bertie Ahern has said that this policy of waiting a generation wasn’t the impression he got from Ian Paisley, he thought that that was not DUP policy, has this been a change?

PETER ROBINSON

Again, the term of waiting a generation isn’t one that I have used in the past. I have indicated that I believe that it could well take a generation for the republican movement to divest itself of the criminality which is endemic within it. That’s a fact of life, I suspect, it’s a sad fact of life, but it’s up to them to prove different to the community. And rather than dealing with the whatiffery, come back to me when they have done those things and then we’ll look at the way forward with them.

NOEL THOMPSON

Well we have to think about what might happen in the weeks before and after an election. I mean there are many people who think that you’ll be in negotiations, okay maybe not directly with Sinn Fein before Christmas. If the IRA said in a few weeks time we’re going to do what Gerry Adams wants us to, we’re abandoning armed struggle forever and ever, you’d be faced with a different prospect?

PETER ROBINSON

I wouldn’t be faced with anything, on the basis of anything that Gerry Adams or the IRA would say. We went into the previous negotiations on the basis of not believing what Gerry Adams and the IRA would say. That’s why we insisted that they had to divvy up first, we weren’t going to take them on their word. 

David Trimble was suckered by that, the Ulster Unionist Party was suckered by that, they went into Government, took them on their word and found out that their word wasn’t worth a wrap but now …

NOEL THOMPSON

You were (unclear) way you (unclear) going into Government. Yes you were.

PETER ROBINSON

No we weren’t, we, this is a fantasy.

NOEL THOMPSON

The British Government produced papers which talked about setting legislation in process to devolve Policing and Justice within a few ...

PETER ROBINSON

Let’s, let’s just, let’s look at the facts rather than your vague impression of the facts. The facts are these, that the Government’s comprehensive proposals made it very clear that there were conditions upon which we would move forward. The conditions were that there had to be a total end to paramilitary activity, a total end to criminality …

NOEL THOMPSON

That’s not what it says in the proposals.

PETER ROBINSON

It is precisely what it says.

NOEL THOMPSON

It says we are confident the steps will (unclear) be taken (unclear).
PETER ROBINSON

It is precisely what it says in the proposals.

NOEL THOMPSON

… to provide for an immediate, full and permanent cessation of all paramilitary activity, the prospect of a new era involving ...

PETER ROBINSON

I’m talking about the Government’s proposal, I’m not talking about anything that the IRA or Sinn Fein might say.

NOEL THOMPSON

(Unclear).

PETER ROBINSON

The Governments requirement in the comprehensive agreement was for a complete end to paramilitary activity, a complete end to all types of criminality and total and complete decommissioning, which had to be verifiable, which had to be timetabled and which had to be transparent, transparent with witnesses and transparent with photographs.

NOEL THOMPSON

Illegal activity doesn’t define it in these proposals.

PETER ROBINSON

That’s right. We had at one stage criminal activity down …(unclear).

NOEL THOMPSON

So you didn’t get that pinned down did you?

PETER ROBINSON

Well if you would listen you would see how foolish your comment is. There are acts that can take place which are illegal but not criminal, illegal is more widely embracing than the word criminal. All illegal activity, that includes all criminal activity and other activity, but which would not have been criminal.

NOEL THOMPSON

But it is a matter of definition (unclear), who’s definition are you going by? Are you going by Michael McDowell’s definition or by the definition of paragraph 13, I mean (unclear)?

PETER ROBINSON

Well Michael McDowell as a member of the Irish Cabinet would have supported the definition that was in the document.

NOEL THOMPSON

What about the devolution of Policing and Justice, I mean that was going to happen within 2 years said the Government?

PETER ROBINSON

No it wasn’t going to happen within two years said the Government. The position was that we refused to go down the road that David Trimble had in his secret talks with the IRA, where at that stage he had given a defined period of time when it would occur. 

By August of this year, David Trimble will have left a situation where Gerry Kelly could have been appointed as a Minister for Policing and Justice. Under our proposals it wouldn’t have happened at all unless the community in Northern Ireland wanted it to happen, we’d given them the veto.

NOEL THOMPSON

Alright, that the British Government would commit to introducing into Parliament by the summer of 2005 the legislation necessary to permit the devolution of Policing and Justice to take place?

PETER ROBINSON

Which could only be activated, if the Assembly voted for it, and the First Minister brought forward a proposal. I can’t see Ian Paisley bringing forward a proposal, I can’t see the Assembly passing it and I can’t see the unionist community in Northern Ireland accepting it in the circumstances …

NOEL THOMPSON

You see as far as republicans are concerned it was the sack cloth and ashes comments which stopped this deal going through, so you were tantalizingly close to signing up to that?

PETER ROBINSON

Well let’s be clear we have no difficulty in terms of asking people to go forward on the basis of complete and verifiable decommissioning and then …

NOEL THOMPSON

But you weren’t talking about 25 years of decontamination at that point?

PETER ROBINSON

Well we made it very clear that there had to be an end to all of their paramilitary and criminal activity and all weapons had to be decommissioned. That’s what was required, they couldn’t sign up to it in December, they can’t sign up to it today and I’ve made my best judgement as I am entitled to and I have to base strategies on that judgement, I don’t see them doing it in this generation. They may, they may surprise us all but it will be a great surprise if they do.

NOEL THOMPSON

But your strategy in December was not based on that length of time, you were talking about a few months of verification, that’s changed hasn’t it?

PETER ROBINSON

And it’s changed to the extent that we have seen that they are not prepared to give up their criminality, even in circumstances that we laid down last December ...

NOEL THOMPSON

So no matter what the IRA says in the next few months? I just want to …

PETER ROBINSON

Yes I want to clear it up too. At the very time where they were negotiating with the Government on these issues they were planning the largest bank robbery in the history of the United Kingdom, that I think gives a fairly clear indication to the mindset of the republican movement.

NOEL THOMPSON

So whatever the IRA does in the next few months you will not change that view of a generation? You will not be in any kind of talks …

PETER ROBINSON

I think it’s about five times now you’ve used this term about the generation …

NOEL THOMPSON

(Unclear).

PETER ROBINSON

… we’ve indicated and you will see in our manifesto that we are not prepared to go into a mandatory coalition with Sinn Fein until we are convinced the circumstances have changed and we see no sign of that happening.

NOEL THOMPSON

So you don’t talk of a generation, you don’t given any timescale at all?

PETER ROBINSON

I don’t believe the word generation is used in (unclear) manifesto.

NOEL THOMPSON

Is there a timescale given?

PETER ROBINSON

Now look, we just don’t see it happening.

NOEL THOMPSON

You’ve got to read it out to me, why don’t you?

PETER ROBINSON

Well why would I launch a …

NOEL THOMPSON

… to clear up the point.

PETER ROBINSON

Why would I launch (unclear) will, I hope you’ll bring me back on the 21st and we’ll talk about it.

NOEL THOMPSON

Bob McCartney’s clearly of the view that (unclear).

PETER ROBINSON

You haven’t asked any other political party of the details of their manifesto before they’ve launched their manifesto. 

NOEL THOMPSON

But this ….

PETER ROBINSON

I’ve made it very clear that our position is that Sinn Fein/IRA could not sign up to the entry conditions that were required. They couldn’t meet the standards that we set down last December. They can’t meet those standards today and I have to make my best judgement because you have to have a political strategy based on what is achievable and what is attainable.

NOEL THOMPSON

So it is feasible by December for example that you could be in talks? It’s conceivable?

PETER ROBINSON

I hope that immediately this election is over we will meet in talks with the Government about having a voluntary coalition with those who are democrats.

NOEL THOMPSON

You know what I mean you could be in talks ….

PETER ROBINSON

Well I hope you know what I mean.

NOEL THOMPSON

(Unclear) a power sharing Executive again by December, by anytime as long as you were satisfied?

PETER ROBINSON

We will be going on the basis that we have outlined in our manifesto which is a belief that we need to have a voluntary coalition with those who are exclusively committed to peaceful and democratic means.

NOEL THOMPSON

You said the most important thing in this election is to prevent Sinn Fein becoming the biggest party. You turned down an alliance with the Ulster Unionists, which would possibly have taken two seats off Sinn Fein and reduced their overall vote in other constituencies. Why did you not go for that?

PETER ROBINSON

Well, first of all, we had a meeting with the Ulster Unionist Party which was presided over by the Grand Master of the Orange Order. At that meeting we made it very clear that there were two seats in Northern Ireland which, more than any others, could be at risk from nationalists and that those were the seats that we needed to pay our attention to. If indeed we went beyond that we were prepared to consider other matters but those were the key issues. The Ulster Unionists made it clear that they weren’t interested in any deal on those two seats. If you don’t have a deal on the two key seats then it would be ludicrous to look at the rest of the propositions. The rest of the propositions were about the Ulster Unionist Party saving their own skin, not fighting David Trimble in Upper Bann, not fighting Roy Beggs in East Antrim and so forth. There is no reason why the unionist community shouldn’t have the opportunity to vote in those areas (unclear).

NOEL THOMPSON

Well one reason might be to reduce Sinn Fein’s ….

PETER ROBINSON

Not, not in those areas it wouldn’t.

NOEL THOMPSON

But overall …(unclear).

PETER ROBINSON

I was just about to come onto the other issue. I am a unionist, I want people in Northern Ireland to vote for unionist principles. I am not in the business of abandoning sections of Northern Ireland, it would have been about a third of Northern Ireland that David Trimble was asking us to allow our voters to vote for nationalist politicians and for nationalist principles. 

On the same day that he was trying to convince us that we should stand aside for the SDLP. The SDLP brought out a document telling us that they were even more republican than Sinn Fein, that they were better united Irelanders than Sinn Fein was. Are we going to ask the unionist community to give a vote for a united Ireland (unclear) or a united Ireland policy. I don’t believe they want to do that.

NOEL THOMPSON

(Unclear) been a unionist tactical vote of course and Michael McGimpsey is now able to say that it was sectarianism which broke down the pact because you couldn’t bring yourself to ask your people to vote, even tactically, for nationalists?

PETER ROBINSON

Well I don’t believe that we should vote tactically for nationalists. I believe that the people in Northern Ireland should have the opportunity to vote for unionist principles. I’m a unionist, I want to increase the unionist vote, I don’t want to give up territory to nationalists.

NOEL THOMPSON

But you said the most important thing was to reduce Sinn Fein’s performance so they wouldn’t be able to say they’re the biggest party and get a worldwide boost, as you yourself put it?

PETER ROBINSON

Well first of all I agree with you that that is a priority. I don’t believe that the battle any longer is a battle for who speaks for unionism, that’s I think settled. The Democratic Unionist Party speaks for the unionist community. This is a battle about who will speak for Northern Ireland. And I believe that the voters, of their own right, in a free election, will be able to come out and ensure that the Democratic Unionist Party speaks for Northern Ireland and is a lead party in Northern Ireland.

NOEL THOMPSON

So beating the Ulster Unionists is more important these days than smashing Sinn Fein?

PETER ROBINSON

Well I thought I’d said the opposite. I thought I’d said that the battle about who speaks for unionism is over, we’ve won, we’ve won that, we’ve had two elections where we’ve topped the poll and the people have clearly indicated their view on that issue. 

This election is about who speaks for Northern Ireland, that is a battle between the Democratic Unionist Party and Sinn Fein and nobody can deny it. It will be one of those two parties that will come out on top and I’m calling on the unionist community to vote for the only party that can do that.

NOEL THOMPSON

Let’s try and look beyond the election. There might soon be a time when the Ulster Unionist Party is without David Trimble, there might soon come a time when your own party is without its long time leader. Are you the man to unite unionism at that stage?

PETER ROBINSON

Well I believe actually that unionism is uniting already. Unionism is uniting behind the Democratic Unionist Party and we have seen that over the past number of months and years. More and more people are joining our party, more and more people are voting for the Democratic Unionist Party and we’re seeing us taking the lead. Indeed, effectively the Ulster Unionist Party has (unclear).

NOEL THOMPSON

(Unclear) the change of course?

PETER ROBINSON

Well of course and the people who will determine that will be the unionist voters of Northern Ireland. But let’s be very clear, this party isn’t complacent, we will fight for every vote, we will put our case before the people and we will urge the people to vote for a unionist (unclear).

NOEL THOMPSON

Just answer the question very quickly. Are you the leader, the potential leader of that unionism?

PETER ROBINSON

I will play whatever part I can to encourage unionists to unite behind a leadership that is working.

 

Return

© Irish American Post
1815 W. Brown Deer Road
Milwaukee, WI  53217
Phone: 414-540-6636
Email: info@irishamericanpost.com



Return to front page